ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As circulating DNA (cirDNA) is mainly detected as mononucleosome-associated circulating DNA (mono-N cirDNA) in blood, apoptosis has until now been considered as the main source of cirDNA. The mechanism of cirDNA release into the circulation, however, is still not fully understood. This work addresses that knowledge gap, working from the postulate that neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) may be a source of cirDNA, and by investigating whether NET may directly produce mono-N cirDNA. METHODS: We studied (1) the in vitro kinetics of cell derived genomic high molecular weight (gHMW) DNA degradation in serum; (2) the production of extracellular DNA and NET markers such as neutrophil elastase (NE) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) by ex vivo activated neutrophils; and (3) the in vitro NET degradation in serum; for this, we exploited the synergistic analytical information provided by specifically quantifying DNA by qPCR, and used shallow WGS and capillary electrophoresis to perform fragment size analysis. We also performed an in vivo study in knockout mice, and an in vitro study of gHMW DNA degradation, to elucidate the role of NE and MPO in effecting DNA degradation and fragmentation. We then compared the NET-associated markers and fragmentation size profiles of cirDNA in plasma obtained from patients with inflammatory diseases found to be associated with NET formation and high levels of cirDNA (COVID-19, N = 28; systemic lupus erythematosus, N = 10; metastatic colorectal cancer, N = 10; and from healthy individuals, N = 114). RESULTS: Our studies reveal that gHMW DNA degradation in serum results in the accumulation of mono-N DNA (81.3% of the remaining DNA following 24 h incubation in serum corresponded to mono-N DNA); "ex vivo" NET formation, as demonstrated by a concurrent 5-, 5-, and 35-fold increase of NE, MPO, and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration in PMA-activated neutrophil culture supernatant, leads to the release of high molecular weight DNA that degrades down to mono-N in serum; NET mainly in the form of gHMW DNA generate mono-N cirDNA (2 and 41% of the remaining DNA after 2 h in serum corresponded to 1-10 kbp fragments and mono-N, respectively) independent of any cellular process when degraded in serum; NE and MPO may contribute synergistically to NET autocatabolism, resulting in a 25-fold decrease in total DNA concentration and a DNA fragment size profile similar to that observed from cirDNA following 8 h incubation with both NE and MPO; the cirDNA size profile of NE KO mice significantly differed from that of the WT, suggesting NE involvement in DNA degradation; and a significant increase in the levels of NE, MPO, and cirDNA was detected in plasma samples from lupus, COVID-19, and mCRC, showing a high correlation with these inflammatory diseases, while no correlation of NE and MPO with cirDNA was found in HI. CONCLUSIONS: Our work describes the mechanisms by which NET and cirDNA are linked. In doing so, we demonstrate that NET are a major source of mono-N cirDNA independent of apoptosis and establish a new paradigm of the mechanisms of cirDNA release in normal and pathological conditions. We also demonstrate a link between immune response and cirDNA.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Extracellular Traps , Animals , Mice , Neutrophils , GenomicsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This executive summary of a national living guideline aims to provide rapid evidence based recommendations on the role of drug interventions in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: The guideline makes use of a systematic assessment and decision process using an evidence to decision framework (GRADE) as recommended standard WHO (2021). Recommendations are consented by an interdisciplinary panel. Evidence analysis and interpretation is supported by the CEOsys project providing extensive literature searches and living (meta-) analyses. For this executive summary, selected key recommendations on drug therapy are presented including the quality of the evidence and rationale for the level of recommendation. RESULTS: The guideline contains 11 key recommendations for COVID-19 drug therapy, eight of which are based on systematic review and/or meta-analysis, while three recommendations represent consensus expert opinion. Based on current evidence, the panel makes strong recommendations for corticosteroids (WHO scale 5-9) and prophylactic anticoagulation (all hospitalized patients with COVID-19) as standard of care. Intensified anticoagulation may be considered for patients with additional risk factors for venous thromboembolisms (VTE) and a low bleeding risk. The IL-6 antagonist tocilizumab may be added in case of high supplemental oxygen requirement and progressive disease (WHO scale 5-6). Treatment with nMABs may be considered for selected inpatients with an early SARS-CoV-2 infection that are not hospitalized for COVID-19. Convalescent plasma, azithromycin, ivermectin or vitamin D3 should not be used in COVID-19 routine care. CONCLUSION: For COVID-19 drug therapy, there are several options that are sufficiently supported by evidence. The living guidance will be updated as new evidence emerges.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 SerotherapyABSTRACT
Hemodialysis patients (HDP) and kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have a high risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 with poor clinical outcomes. Because of this, vaccination of these groups of patients against SARS-CoV-2 is particularly important. However, immune responses may be impaired in immunosuppressed and chronically ill patients. Here, our aim was to compare the efficacy of an mRNA-based vaccine in HDP, KTR, and healthy subjects. DESIGN: In this prospective observational cohort study, the humoral and cellular response of prevalent 192 HDP, 50 KTR, and 28 healthy controls (HC) was assessed 1, 2, and 6 months after the first immunization with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. RESULTS: After 6 months, 97.5% of HDP, 37.9% of KTR, and 100% of HC had an antibody response. Median antibody levels were 1539.7 (±3355.8), 178.5 (±369.5), and 2657.8 (±2965.8) AU/mL in HDP, KTR, and HC, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). A SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific cell response to vaccination was found in 68.8% of HDP, 64.5% of KTR, and 90% of HC. CONCLUSION: The humoral response rates to mRNA-based vaccination of HDPs are comparable to HCs, but antibody titers are lower. Furthermore, HDPs have weaker T-cell response to vaccination than HCs. KTRs have very low humoral and antigen-specific cellular response rates and antibody titers, which requires other vaccination strategies in addition to booster vaccination.